MR HARRIS IN REPLY.
v To the Editor of tho Times.) Sir, —I atn pleased to see that Mr Stafford has at last agreed with me, and he really leaves mo no further points to answer. lie states that if the figures quoted are right some properties are paying less than half what they should. That has been my contention, and what I have fully proved, and of which I have plenty more proof if it is necessary to give. What I have contended is that there should be equalisation ; not that one property should be paying much higher rates than another property of exactly the same nature. As to Mr Stafford's conviction that the rates for water and drainage would be double what is estimated by Mr Lysnar, I say, let Mr Stafford show us how he makes that out. Wo all want any information that can bo given. I must assume that I have at last set Mr Sievwright’s doubts at rest, for he has gracefully retired from the fray.—l am, etc., Frank Harris.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19010627.2.39
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Gisborne Times, Volume V, Issue 143, 27 June 1901, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
176MR HARRIS IN REPLY. Gisborne Times, Volume V, Issue 143, 27 June 1901, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in