Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

AUSTRALIA’S NAVAL DEFENCE

DISCUSSED AT BOYAL COLONIAL INSTITUTE.

By Telegraph—Press Association—Copyright Received 11.10 p.m., March 11. London, March 10. The Earl of Aberdeen presided at the reading of Senator Matheson’s paper on ! Australia and naval defence, before the ■ Royal Colonial Institute. Mr Mathewson declared that Australia's first duty in connection with Imperial defence was to provide absoluto security for a base in the Pacific, leaving offensive action to the British navy. No local defence would be efficient without a squadron of sea-going cruisers operating in Australian waters for the defence of floating trade, and under Australian control. Australia ought to rent British protected vessels of three thousand tons, armed with modern 61, five quick-firers, costing £IOO,OOO each, manned by Australian crews, until able to " navy. With her present means acquire » "—fie such cruisers, and she should rent iu.. u , three others within three yeai-.' . I sisted that Admiral Beaumont’s req<J re " ments showed that the squadron the Admiralty now offered Australia was insufficient. The speakers included Admirals Bowden, Smith, Fremantle, and Fitzgerald, Lords Brassey, Lamington, and Farrington. The Admirals contended that the cost of the proposed fleet was ridiculously understated. More powerful vessels were required to follow the enemy on the Australian trading route. Circumstances might render it essential for the j Australian squadron to co-operate with the China fleet. Admiral Fremantle declared that if the South Atlantic squadron was composed of heavy, fast cruisers it j would prove a better defence of Australian I trade than Matheson’s scheme. The Queensland Agent-General said that the | Commonwealth had neither money nor men to undertake an Australian fleet at present. Mr Copeland said that it was neither reasonable nor honest to expect jreat Britain to protect Australian foreign ;rade without proper contribution to the SI avy.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19030312.2.9

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Gisborne Times, Volume IX, Issue 838, 12 March 1903, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
294

AUSTRALIA’S NAVAL DEFENCE Gisborne Times, Volume IX, Issue 838, 12 March 1903, Page 2

AUSTRALIA’S NAVAL DEFENCE Gisborne Times, Volume IX, Issue 838, 12 March 1903, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert