FISCAL QUESTION.
CHAMBERLAIN AND SALISBURY
By Telegraph—Press Association—Copyright Received 10.14 p.m., March SO. London, March SO. Sir Michael Hicks-Beach. in a letter to the Timos, says that while the late Lord Salisbury was doubtless awars of Mr OhamberJoin’s views on colonial preference, yet he (Sir Miohael Hicks-Bsach) was confident that neither Lord Salisbury nor the Cabinet had even authorised Mr Chamberlain to propose or aocept at a colonial conference thß principle of preference, especially in foodstuffs. * The Times says. that Lord Salisbury’s objections to Mr Chamberlain’s proposals wore mostly founded on tactical considerations ruther than tho question of principles.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19050331.2.13
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Gisborne Times, Volume XVII, 31 March 1905, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
99FISCAL QUESTION. Gisborne Times, Volume XVII, 31 March 1905, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
The Gisborne Herald Company is the copyright owner for the Gisborne Times. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of the Gisborne Herald Company. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in