Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

A REVOLVER CASE

IMPERTINENCE OF MAN WHO CAUSED TROUBLE. j (Per Press Associate n.J Auckland, last night. I A breach of the Licensing Act at the 1 Britomart hotel on July 19th, for which I the licensee and his wife were summoned at the Police Court, was shown to have originated through the cooduot of a '* mad J drunk ’’ man, who flourished a revolver, j and was not satisfied until he obtained a I whisky and soda. Defendants, William John Baker and bis wife (Ann Jane Bake), wore charged with having unlawfully sold intoxicants to Alexander Guddiford, who j was already In a state of drunkenness. Mr J. O. Martin, who, represented the Bakers, said the faot3 were not disputed. Baker was absent from the hotel on busijaess, and left his wife in charge. Guddiford me In, and made trouble in the passage e hotel, where he wandered about with a revolver. He threatened to shoot some-

ooe outside, but did not try to use the re- ] volyer in tbe hotel. One of his friends offered to take him borne, but be obstinately refused until he got drink. Mrs Baker tried to satisfy him with a non-in-toxicant drink, but be refused it. At last Mrs Bakor consented to give Guddiford a whisky and soda, and his friends took him

*“Hway j \ V Mr 8. Mays (representing the Crown j i stated that the facts mentioned j 1 by Mr Martin were substantially correct, I 1 but Guddiford, soon after leaving the hotel, was arrested by the polios in a mad state of drunkenness. He was flourishing a re-1 volvor, and had a pookei full of cartridges, which did not fit it, 1 His Worship came to the conclusion that J the breach of the Aot’ was not deliberate. 1 Baker was discharged upon paying costs, 1 and Mrs Baker was fined a nominal amount of 6s, with costs. Guddiford, who was doscribod by Mr Hays as thß author of the mischief, was asked if be claimed expenses for attending the Court as a witness. He replied in the affirmative. “ I am surprised at your impertinence," sharply replied tho Magistrate, who dis allowed the application, and suggested that Onddiford ought to pay tho expenses of the people whom he had put to ao muoh JIQUble,

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19051004.2.39

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Gisborne Times, Volume XIX, Issue 1575, 4 October 1905, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
384

A REVOLVER CASE Gisborne Times, Volume XIX, Issue 1575, 4 October 1905, Page 3

A REVOLVER CASE Gisborne Times, Volume XIX, Issue 1575, 4 October 1905, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert