Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ARBITRATION COURT.

SITTING IN WELLINGTON. WHARF LABORERS’ CASE.

Press Association. WELLINGTON, March 19. The Arbitration Court, at to-day s sitting, proceeded with the hearing of the wharf laborers’ dispute. The Union S.S. C'o., Wellington Harbor Board, and local and foreign-going shipowners were severally represented. . . . The demands of the Lmon included the Saturday half-holiday for all classes of labor or overtime pay in lieu thereof;-an increase of 3d for working cement, lime, manure, and shale; ail increase of 2d for handling coal on the shovel and top work; an increase of 6d for handling frozen produce in freezing chambers, and 3d in cool chambers; proper accommodation and fares for out ports; payment from the time of leaving the place of engagement till returning. Tho demands for holidays are practically tho same as the existing award, except the asking for a special day for a picnic and double overtime on Sundays, Christmas Day, Good Friday, and union picnic day. Double time is asked for working in meal hours. It is also asked that prompter payment of wages and that the weight stipulation should apply to men in the hold as well as on the wharves. Other new features were that tho men should be paid overtime for the time spent “standing by” under orders, and that payment should be from tile time of engagement until they are discharged. In handling beef not less than six men are employed on the side, and that award should apply to permanent hands as well as casuals.

A representative of the employers handed in a statement showing that they were willing to practically adhere to the present award. The case for the Union had not concluded w-hen t-lio Court rose.

The bakers’ dispute will probably be taken to-morrow afternoon.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19080320.2.11

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Gisborne Times, Volume XXVI, Issue 2144, 20 March 1908, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
293

ARBITRATION COURT. Gisborne Times, Volume XXVI, Issue 2144, 20 March 1908, Page 2

ARBITRATION COURT. Gisborne Times, Volume XXVI, Issue 2144, 20 March 1908, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert