Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

A WELLINGTON CASE.

BOY BITTEN BY DOG. PLAINTIFF AWARDED £2O. Press Association. WELLINGTON, May 12. Tho sum of fifty pounds damages tor the bite of a dog was claimed by Harry White, a boy of ten, from Robert William Paterson, hotelkeeper, this morning, and the case was heard by Dr. McArthur. The boy, who appeared rather delicate, stated that on tho 4th of April lie was going round on a milk-cart, when the milkman called at Mr. Pat--5, 1 ' son ’s house * the boy went "in with the milk, and in the passage lie saw a dog, a bull terrier, lying oil the mat, and tho dog knocked him agamst the wall, afterwards seizing lnm by the hip and hanging on until Mr. L aterson came to tho rescue. Mrs, i aterson attended to the boy, and alter the doctor had treated him lie was sent away with a sovereign by Mr. Paterson.

lienry V lute, the boy’s father, declared that lie had told Air. Paterson,. that if ho would destroy the dog there would ;bc no further trouble, but Mr Paterson refused.

JJ , r , ; 9. racr<>it Wlls ou submitted on behalf oi Mr. Paterson that the dog was far too valuable to bo destroyed, being worth at least £2O Robert Wm. Paterson stated that it was the noise made by tho can as tho boy was returning, that made tho dog spring at him. Witness gave tlie boy a. sovereign, telling him that it was something to buy lollies with. The dog was not ferocious at all, and bis little boy, five years old, used to play with it like a kitten. Tho boy would take a niece of meat out of tho dog’s mouth. Mr. Hordmau: A discriminating dog. He took a piece of meat out of tho other boy’s mouth.

His Worship said that if a person had a dog like the one in question, he.must accept his responsibilities. Judgment would be for the plaintiff for £2O and costs £l4 16s.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19080513.2.24

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Gisborne Times, Volume XXVI, Issue 2189, 13 May 1908, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
334

A WELLINGTON CASE. Gisborne Times, Volume XXVI, Issue 2189, 13 May 1908, Page 2

A WELLINGTON CASE. Gisborne Times, Volume XXVI, Issue 2189, 13 May 1908, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert