Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

FARM LABORERS’ DISPUTE

EXPLANATION TO ARBITRATION COURT.

Press Association. GIIHLSTCHUBOH, June 15. .‘i The dispute between the Canterbury Agricultural and Pastoral I/ab- - h i orers’ Union (Mr. Thorn) and tho Canterbury farmers (Mr. D. Jones) iSf and sheep-owners (Mr. Acland) was fig: mentioned at the Arbitration Court jV this morning. Tho President (Mr.Justice -Sim) asked when the Board’s i'Yi; report mould be ready. Mr. Acland said that it had taken Vi him two months to preparo a digest ’-/ji of the evidence. ' Mr. AV. Alinson (Chairman of tho Conciliation Board), replying to tho \ President, said that he did not think that the Board could report much under three weeks. The President: Three weeks? You ought to have your minds made up ff&Li and should only require to compare -V views. Air. -Minson said the difficulty w-a 6 to put in legal terms for the guidance y of the Court the Board’s decision. The President said that there -was no necessity to do so. Mr. Minson said that tho 80-ard-Vf •had deputed him to interview His <^^-.„j Honor in order to ascertain .froni'liimfsuggestions as ,to the simplifies of the Board’s work. Tho Board mas it ' not composed of legal men, and it ,'Vwas doing its work in -its own way. ?,« It was probable that His Honor might suggest -a shorter way to tlio , v'iv J Board. Each party to the dispute'KSfll had h uided m tabulated Statements'Ll <&> giving summaries of the evidence. As' they were at variance, the Board ifMftj considers it absolutely necessary that ' '.yl' tho Board should prepare one of its own for tlio Court to work 'upon. '- -- This would be a big work. Ho prepared to admit t.hat five would not do tho work so quickly’ as two. “ He also referred to the list handed C into the Board hv Air. Acland. Air. Acland explained that it dealt with wages, hours, conditions, and .-..V;whether or not there was dissatisfae-, tion. bide issues, such as preference to unionists, were not dealt with. TlieiPrcsideivt, afterconsultinglwith tie Court said to Air. Alinson-that the Board lnd beeu directed to report on a fair and reasonable settlement of the dispute and also under four Vy4 specified heads, and ho understood ,Lift om what Air. Alinson -bad said that V-iv tho Board-, -would liavo difficultv in dealing with these last-mentioned '.yd? matters, and what the -Court bad do- -»L.'■£ cided upon was that the Board should . report as to what was ia fair and roa.sonaoloj Kotilemont of t>he <1 is puto ’ and never mind other matters. ~0 Air. 'Alinson: Wo are not to show anv reasons for our decision? . ... *-*'® President: Show anything'you . nke. but you are under no obligation to do so. Pile Board nee<l not report 1 oil tho Special matters but only as - \*r to what -would be a. fair and ireason- '-s able settlement of the dispute. Howlong would that take? V2 Air. Alinson: I should think most '? likely 111 a week. -ff. lhc.President: I think that memhers of the Board having heard all the evidence, should have made up 1 tlie:r minds on tlie matters raised by the dispute. .'l;;**

Air. Alinson said that if the Board ->£; had been -aware that it was to report on a lair and reasonable settlement ASal of ibe dispute it was in a position .'lll to do so a mouth ago. Thev mould gel a report tiled this -week. mir Alinson said llial lit" himself saw no N f Vi reisou why tills could not be done. The President asked that the Je&j Board should file its report this week Vfj and, in reply f© Air. Jones, said that ; S if the report wiis filed as expected the. Court would discuss Hu* preliminaries ffj with the parties on die 20th inst.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19080616.2.26

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Gisborne Times, Volume XXVI, Issue 2218, 16 June 1908, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
627

FARM LABORERS’ DISPUTE Gisborne Times, Volume XXVI, Issue 2218, 16 June 1908, Page 2

FARM LABORERS’ DISPUTE Gisborne Times, Volume XXVI, Issue 2218, 16 June 1908, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert