Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ALLEGED BREACH OF PRIVILEGE.

THE DUKE OF NORFOLK’S CASE.

HIS REPLY TO THE HOUSE OF COMMONS.

United Punas Association-Copyright LONDON, August 12. In reference to the cable of July 21st the Duke of Norfolk wrote that he had not authorised the publication of the letter to Mr Profumo. If the Committee of Privileges desired his presence he presumed the application must be made to' the House of Lords. The House of Commons committee’s decis-* ion in the matter was adjourned. [The cable message of July 21st was as follows: “On the motion of Mr Dillon, seconded by Mr John Redmond,, they, House of Commons resolved that the Duke of Norfolk had been of a breach of privilege in writing to the Unionist candidate for High Peak in the interest of the Catholic schools. Mr Asquith expressed the view that the House of Commons would be stultifying itself if it allowed the matter t-o pass . unnoticed. Mr Balfour said that the matter was trivial, and he twitted the Radicals with furbishing up .rusty wea r pons of immemorial antiquity instead of preserving the living and working elements of the Constitution. Mr Profumo was the Unionist candidate for High Peak. The resolution declaring the Duke of Norfolk guilty of a breach of privilege was carried by a party, t vote.]

CABLE NEWS.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19090814.2.26.2

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Gisborne Times, Volume XXVII, Issue 2580, 14 August 1909, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
220

ALLEGED BREACH OF PRIVILEGE. Gisborne Times, Volume XXVII, Issue 2580, 14 August 1909, Page 5

ALLEGED BREACH OF PRIVILEGE. Gisborne Times, Volume XXVII, Issue 2580, 14 August 1909, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert