A MINING CASE.
PEGGING OUT A CLAIM.
rPra Pb« h A S O e ~l j 3 Warden Burgess in dehvering judgment in a case where, after a decree of forfeiture had been granted, the applicant claimed to have re-pegged ground by formally placing bis hands on the existing pegs, stated that that was not sufficient to con sLtutea mark-out. New pegs to ae put in. Acquiescence m the position of nreviouslv existing pegs cannot be re-tra-rded as marking out. The Magisthat the claim had notte marked out according to law, and refused the application. . , ,
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19090914.2.31
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Gisborne Times, Volume XXVII, Issue 2606, 14 September 1909, Page 5
Word count
Tapeke kupu
95A MINING CASE. Gisborne Times, Volume XXVII, Issue 2606, 14 September 1909, Page 5
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
The Gisborne Herald Company is the copyright owner for the Gisborne Times. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of the Gisborne Herald Company. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in