A DISPUTED CLAIM.
SALE OF A COTTAGE.
DECISION RESERVED
The sale of a cottage situated m Ballanee Street was the subject of a civil action at the Magistrate’s Court yesterday 7 . Andrew Hoed (Mr. Burnard) sued Wm. Burkett (Mr. Bright) for £ll 10s, being the amount alleged to be due in respect of the sale, or 7 in the alternative, £ll 10s for the use and occupation of the cottage. The plaintiff stated that he was the owner of a cottage in Ballanee Street, Gisborne. The defendant and his wflfe went to plaiiTtiff in April last and asked him if he had any empty houses, and plaintiff pointed out the house mentioned. On returning, defendant asked the rent, and plaintiff said 15s per week. The defendant then wanted to know 7 the price of the property. Plaintiff told him his usual terms v 7 ere £SO deposit-. Defendant said he had not that amount. He only had £2O. This plaintiff accepted, with 15s per week, being principal and interest on the purchase price, £SOO. It was arranged with defendant that the interest should be 7 per cent, and he took possession, a few days later. Defendant had the option of paying £2O or more every twelve months."’ He paid rent from time to time, but lie fell into arrears to the extent of £8 or £lO, but later he paid all but a small balance. He fell into arrears again to the extent of £ll 10s, which was due on January 23rd. He now owed plaintiff that amount. Plaintiff offered to allow defendant to pick anv section lie liked, and he would build a house- for him.
Murray Ontlibert, land salesman, residing at Gisborne, said he had the property in his hands for sale in March and April last vear. He had occasion to submit the property for sale, but defendant’s wife said' that her husband had bought the property. ' E. C. H. Hamlin gave evidence as to defendant making payments for rent. Mr. Bright moved for a nonsuit on the ground that it was a case for specific performance, and the Court had no power to deal with it. The Magistrate reserved his decision on the nonsuit point.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19110218.2.101
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Gisborne Times, Volume XXIX, Issue 3148, 18 February 1911, Page 11
Word count
Tapeke kupu
369A DISPUTED CLAIM. Gisborne Times, Volume XXIX, Issue 3148, 18 February 1911, Page 11
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
The Gisborne Herald Company is the copyright owner for the Gisborne Times. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of the Gisborne Herald Company. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in