Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

DEAL IN POTATOES.

WERE THEY BLIGHTED? A CIVIL ACTION. At the Magistrate’s Court yesterday, before Mr. W. A. Barton, SAL, Walter Pilcher (Mr. Burnard) claimed £3 2s from Joseph Cox (Mr. Stock), the value of five hags of potatoes supplied. The defendant had paid £1 7s into Court. The plaintiff gave evidence as to supplying the potatoes, and defendant refusing to pay for them because he said there were a large number of small potatoes, and some were blighted. Defendant wanted to take back three bags, but he refused.

J. E. Charles, who saw the potatoes, said that some of them looked to be bad.

William Pilcher, a brother of the plaintiff, said he assisted to dig the potatoes and bag them.. About a quarter were small ones—not quite the size of an egg. They were not too small to use, and they were not blighted.

The defendant stated that he arranged with plaintiff to purchase potatoes. Pilcher went to him in the first instance and represented that he had a first-class line of xjotatoes, free from blight, and that there were no small potatoes in the line. Defendant offered plaintiff 7s or 7s 6d, hut plaintiff would not accept that. Finally an arrangement was come to, and he decided to purchase. He examined the potatoes later, and found good potatoes on the top, but as he got down he found the potatoes were much smaller, and he stopped selling them. Some of the potatoes were blighted.. He showed plaintiff the potatoes when he called for his cheque, and there were 25 to 30 per cent, unfit for sale. Witness refused co take the potatoes unless plaintiff picked the small ones out. He agreed to pay for the two bags he had used.

Joshua Lawrence, who examined the potatoes, said that about 25 per cent, were blighted. There were a number of small potatoes. Thos. Ellery said there was 25 per cent, of blighted potatoes, and from 10 to 15 per cent, were rotten.

Henry Currie also gave evidence. Tiie Magistrate gave judgment for plaintiff for the amount paid into Court, £1 7s.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19110218.2.12

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Gisborne Times, Volume XXIX, Issue 3148, 18 February 1911, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
353

DEAL IN POTATOES. Gisborne Times, Volume XXIX, Issue 3148, 18 February 1911, Page 2

DEAL IN POTATOES. Gisborne Times, Volume XXIX, Issue 3148, 18 February 1911, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert