Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SUPREME COURT.

SITTINGS AT MASTERTON. ,

[PER PRESS ASSOCIATION.J MASTERTON, March 29

At the Supreme Court Leo Barter was found 1 guilty on a charge of arson. He was admitted to probation for four months, and ordered to pay costs, £lO. In the case of Anders OJsen, Eketahuna, v. Thomas Gwynn Williams, .Canterbury, claim for specific performance regarding the purchase of a farm for £2768, the defence admitted the material alterations in the claim, and counsel moved for judgment on the pleading, which was granted'. An order was made for payment of the amount of claim, with costs. In the case in which F. C. Fox claimed £5Ol damages from Frederick O’Connor, the jury, after a retirement of over three hours, returned a verdict for the defendant. Michael McGovern claimed from one Hodd £SOO for alleged breach of specific performance of an agreement concerning the purchase of some land of which part was freehold and part leasehold. After hearing the evidence of the plaintiff, his Honour nonsuited the plaintiff with costs. AN IMPORTANT DECISION. WELLINGTON, March'29. The Chief Justice gave a somewhat important decision to-day on an originating summons in which four children disinherited by their mother’s will, asked that provision be made for them. The proceedings were connected with the estate of Elizabeth Green, worth £930, which had been left to a sister of the testator’s, plaintiffs claiming that they were in poor circumstances, and that no adequate provision had been made for them. The claims of two plaintiffs were dismissed, and they were ordered to pay £lO 10s to defray the cost of the executors had been put to. The third plaintiff his Honor ordered should, receive 5s per week, and the fourth plaintiff a sum of £SO. The two latter were suffering from a physical ailment.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19110330.2.65

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Gisborne Times, Volume XXIX, Issue 3182, 30 March 1911, Page 7

Word count
Tapeke kupu
298

SUPREME COURT. Gisborne Times, Volume XXIX, Issue 3182, 30 March 1911, Page 7

SUPREME COURT. Gisborne Times, Volume XXIX, Issue 3182, 30 March 1911, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert