Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

COURT OF APPEAL.

A NEW TRIAL ORDERED

[PEE PEESS ASSOCIATION.] WELLINGTON, April 10. In the .Appeal Court the case cf Rex v. Harvard, alias Shepherd, was heard, The prisoner was charged with stealing a sheep dog, and, on a second count, with receiving it, knowing it to have been dishonestly obtained. The jury found that there was not sufficient evidence to prove that accused stole, the dog, and on a second count that prisoner detained the dog, knowing it to have been stolen, /the Court held that the verdict was ambiguous and inconclusive, not showing when the guilty knowledge arose, and ordered a new trial upon the second count at the next Palmerston North sittings.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19110411.2.18

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Gisborne Times, Volume XXIX, Issue 3192, 11 April 1911, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
115

COURT OF APPEAL. Gisborne Times, Volume XXIX, Issue 3192, 11 April 1911, Page 3

COURT OF APPEAL. Gisborne Times, Volume XXIX, Issue 3192, 11 April 1911, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert