Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

FLYING MACHINE PATENTS.

FRENCH COURT’S DIFFICULTY

‘AVIATION TOO NEW A SCIENCE.’

In the suit brought by the Wright Brothers, the American airmen, against several French aeroplane manufacturers, to recover damages for infringements of their patents, the Third Tribune upheld the plaintiffs’ contention in principle,-but declared that it did not wish at- present to render a definite decision, as aviation was too new a science to admit of an arbitrary finding in such a case. The court expresed the opinion that an effort should be made to ascertain whether there existed any aviation discoveries calculated to disprove the priority of the Wrights’ inventions.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19110513.2.4

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Gisborne Times, Volume XXIX, Issue 3217, 13 May 1911, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
102

FLYING MACHINE PATENTS. Gisborne Times, Volume XXIX, Issue 3217, 13 May 1911, Page 2

FLYING MACHINE PATENTS. Gisborne Times, Volume XXIX, Issue 3217, 13 May 1911, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert