ALLEGED PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT.
Mil J. R. LUND ON’S' CASE. (Per Press Association.) WELLINGTON, Oct. 17. Conti lining his argument in re Lunclon before the Court of Appeal tins morning, Mr Morison submitted that f the main' charges against London were dependent upon the statements of Hadden, a convicted criminal, -which were directly contradicted by Lnndon, whose affidavit was entitled to more weight than that of Hadden. IT© also contended repayment of th© money received' from the police was not of importance, because it was paid under a misunderstanding that that was to be the' end of the whole matter. If, he said, London had thought the matter would still be investigated by the Law Society he would ' av© fought th© matter out in the Magistrate’s Court, and would not have repaid the money. In conclusion Mr Morison said there was not a single authority in which matters of the kind alleged against Lundon had been a ground for striking a solicitor off the roll. The Court’s decision was reserved.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19111018.2.10
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Gisborne Times, Volume XXIX, Issue 3351, 18 October 1911, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
169ALLEGED PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT. Gisborne Times, Volume XXIX, Issue 3351, 18 October 1911, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
The Gisborne Herald Company is the copyright owner for the Gisborne Times. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of the Gisborne Herald Company. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in