Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WHAT IS A NEAR RELATIVE?

PECULIAR* LOCAL CASE

A somewhat unusual case came before Air. \A r . A. Barton, S.M., at the Magistrate’s Court yesterday morning, when Hugh Marshall, laborer, of AVh atatutu, was charged with failing to contribute towards the support of a child in the special home at Otekaike, while possessing the means to do so.

Air Bernard appeared for the defendant, and objected to an order, pointing out that under the Industrial School Act defendant was not liable, as the child was an illegitimate child of his wife’s. His AVorshin said the case was brought under the Destitute Persons’ Act. Sergt. Hutton called the defendant to give evidence, but he appeared in an intoxicated condition, and the Magistrate ordered him to stand clown.

Mr Bnrnard said the question really deoended on whether the defendant was a near relative or not. His AVorshin quoted from the Act, giving a definition of a near relative. Air Burnard: Under that definition defendant is not liable, as is relationship is simply that he married the mother of an illegitimate child. He. pointed out that illegitimates’ near relatives were defined undei\,sub-see-t-ion 2, and they were' its mother, itsmother’s relatives, and its reputed father’s relatives. Tlie step-father was in a totally different position, and did not come within the meaning of the Act at all. Counsel said he had thought the case was under the Industrial School Act, and curiously enough the same thing applied there. His AVorshin: You say the defendant is not liable for the maintenance of the illegitimate child of his wife ? Mr Burnard: Yes.

His Worship said he thought there was a case on the question, and lie adjourned the case in order to look into the point raised,

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19120622.2.70

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Gisborne Times, Volume XXX, Issue 3556, 22 June 1912, Page 11

Word count
Tapeke kupu
290

WHAT IS A NEAR RELATIVE? Gisborne Times, Volume XXX, Issue 3556, 22 June 1912, Page 11

WHAT IS A NEAR RELATIVE? Gisborne Times, Volume XXX, Issue 3556, 22 June 1912, Page 11

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert