Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

HOME RULE BILL.

REJECTED BY THE LORDS

[UNITED PRESS ASSOCIATION—COPYRIGH LONDON, July 15. j Tho Lords rejected the Home Ilu Bill.

Lord Morley said that the Cover) ment had been asked what they worndo in tho event of violent disorder i Belfast, hut he declined to say wh i they would do in a purely hvpothet cal contingency.

TO AVERT A CIVIL WAR. "- WHY UNIONISTS WANT AN ELECTION. (Received Julv 16, 10.40 p.m.) LONDON, July 16. In the House o.f Lords’ discussioi on the Home Rule Bill Lord Curzoi said the opposition wanted an eiectioi because tiiey wanted to avert a civi war. Lord Morley, in winding up the debate, was repeatedly pressed by the Opposition to say whether troops would be ordered, to fire on loyalists. He refused to answer, but said he was confident that in a difficult or dangerous crisis the authorities would do al! the public dutylm posed on them tor the maintenance of order.

He contended that a referendum or; a dissolution before a Bill was passed: would lie a far greater blow to Parliamentary authority than anything in; the Parliament Act. He was sure that when the Irish party had a Parliament! of their own they would show the same; statemanlike spirit they had shown, hitherto and would make it a success, j Lord Lorehorne again appealed for ai comprehensive settlement by consent j to a consultation in goodwill. If this : effort failed then would be the time; for a general election. The Marquis of Londonderry ernphasised the unanimity and determina- j tion of the Irish Protestants against > Home Rule. . j Lord Lm-ithgov, in his maiden , speech, said the Bill was calculated to j infuriate beyond measure the people j of Ulster without assuaging a single j existing difficulty. The Archbishops and six Bishops present voted with the majority. The 5 Bishops of Oxford and Hereford, who in 1912 voted for the Bill, were absent.

RIOTOUS EXCURSIONISTS. CATHOLICS’ DWELLINGS WRECKED. LONDON, July 15. Excursionists at Castle Dawson attacked the Hibernian Hall. They destroyed the drums and banners, and wrecked twenty-two Catholics’ dwellings. Revolvers were fired, but no one was hurt.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19130717.2.49

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Gisborne Times, Volume XXXVI, Issue 3986, 17 July 1913, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
356

HOME RULE BILL. Gisborne Times, Volume XXXVI, Issue 3986, 17 July 1913, Page 5

HOME RULE BILL. Gisborne Times, Volume XXXVI, Issue 3986, 17 July 1913, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert