Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

A LONE FIGHT

“BUT WE WERE NOT ABANDONED BY WORKERS.” GENERAL COUNCIL LEADING MINERS INTO OPEN TRAP. MEN REFUSED TO BE CAUGHT. MINERS’ FEDERATION STATEMENT UN STRIJvE. (United Press Assn.—Copyright.) LONDON, Jan. 21. “If we were deserted and forced to fight a lone fight, it was not by the workers that we were abandoned.” This sentence at the outset is characteristic of a strongly-worded statement by the Miners’ Federation on the general strike for a conference of the Trade Union executives.

The statement declares that the general strike was the climax of concerted endeavors on the part of the employers for years to solve their problem by wage cutting, in- 1925 it was narrowed to the mining industry, with its special difficulties. The first attempt at a general wages reduction in July, 1925, was defeated because the Labor movement, under the then strong determined leadership of the Trades’- Union Council, stood by the miners, and the Government, which backed the coalowners, was compelled to postpone the conflict and take time to load its guns.

The real purpose of the Royal Commission thereafter appointed, the statement adds, was to find an argument! which divided the united front of the whole movement. The Council which in February, 1926, reaffirmed the solidarity of the miners and other trade unionists, hesitated six months later, after the publication of the Commission’s report, to reaffirm the position on which it had committed the whole movement. Thus the workers entered the general strike unaware that the Trades Union Council contemplated yielding. Having decided on a policy of yielding, they yielded consistently until the end. Summing • up a lengthy argument in defence of the miners’ rejection of the Samuel memorandum, the statement declares: “To put it bluntly the General Council were leading the miners into a trap, but tho miners refused to ho entrapped.” The statement concludes: “The fight is. not over. Longer hours and lower wages cannot bring peace in the coalfields. We will not allow district agreements to shatter our strength. The unity of our organisation is still intact. We arc determined to recover the lost ground, and look confidently to the "support of the whole trade union movement.”

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19270122.2.35

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Gisborne Times, Volume LXV, Issue 10312, 22 January 1927, Page 7

Word count
Tapeke kupu
363

A LONE FIGHT Gisborne Times, Volume LXV, Issue 10312, 22 January 1927, Page 7

A LONE FIGHT Gisborne Times, Volume LXV, Issue 10312, 22 January 1927, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert