Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

H.A.C.B. SOCIETY, CHRISTCHURCH.

To the Editor of the Globe

Sir, —In your issue of last night a letter signed Joseph B. Sheath appeared under the above heading. Why this gentleman should rush into print on this occasion I am at a loss to understand. One would expect better from any member of our Society, but especially of him. Supposing he had just cause to grumble (they say it's an Englishman's privilege) why didn't he wait till the next Lodge night, and then relieve himself of his burden.

I regret that short as his note is, he has shown a most deplorable ignorance of the rules.

First—He states " the presiding officers could be fined." Who ever heard of presiding officers at a meeting, of course he means the President or Chairman for the~ time being, for he and he only is held responsible for any informalities which may occur during the time of meeting. And in this case no rule was broken. A law states —That the president shall not put to the meeting for confirmation, <fcc, &c. But the President never put nominations to the meeting except on election night, which in this instance takes place only on the 23rd instant.

Secondly—lt is questionable if nominations on such occasions need seconders, as they differ slightly from ordinary propositions.

Thirdly Any financial member can nominate, and the president is not bound to ascertain whether or no the candidates consent has been ascertained, especially when there are more than one for the office, as was the case in this instance; neither is he answerable for blunders committed by those who think fit to supply locals to newspapers, for the local referred to by Mr J. B. Sheath is only partly correct. In conclusion, may I ask who those " Influential members " are who waited upon Mr Sheath ? In my opinion we, as members of the same society, have alike the same privileges. .Apologising for thus trespassing, yet trusting you will insert the above, I remain Yours, &c, AN UNINFLUENTIAL MEMBER.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GLOBE18751215.2.12.1

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Globe, Volume IV, Issue 469, 15 December 1875, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
337

H.A.C.B. SOCIETY, CHRISTCHURCH. Globe, Volume IV, Issue 469, 15 December 1875, Page 2

H.A.C.B. SOCIETY, CHRISTCHURCH. Globe, Volume IV, Issue 469, 15 December 1875, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert