A telegram from Wellington states that the pase Goldsmith v. Campbell,’a motion for writ of prohibition to restrain /he Magistrate from proceeding in the oasa on the ground that his jurisdiction was ousted by reason of title to land being in question, Was heard and judgment given for defendant with £l2 12s costs. This case had been partly heard and adjourned for further affidavits to be filed. Two oases arising out of the Ross affair were also disposed of. In Common Shelton & Co. ▼. Ross, Ross had appealed from the Magistrates decision, by whom it was held that Rose junior bed acted as Boss senior’s agent. The Bench held that no agency was proved nqd upheld tlje appeal, with 7 guineas costs. An appeal ;n the interpleader, Boss and wife v. Whintay, ;n pibieb tbe farmer olaim-d goods seize) under . warrant joeuet by Whinray on a judgment against Bom junior, the Magistrate's decision that the goods were rightfully earned was uphe d and the appeal distolaeed, with 7 guineas oostl.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GSCCG18891017.2.14
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Gisborne Standard and Cook County Gazette, Volume III, Issue 365, 17 October 1889, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
169Untitled Gisborne Standard and Cook County Gazette, Volume III, Issue 365, 17 October 1889, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.