Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

It is strange how any man with plenty of " front ” can successfully travel through New Zealand. Mr Christie Murray v'as received, so to speak, with open arms in the colonies, and was allowed, without question, to constitute himself a critic on all things colonial. He did not hesitate to give very pronounced opinions on the subjects that came under his notice, and there was a strong flavor of high morality in all his public views. His later career in the colonies will probably dispel some of the delusions concerning the novelist. A Melbourne telegram of March 4

states : —“ Mr D. Christie Murray, who has been connected with the St. Maur Dramatic Company, was advertised to perform in Geelong on the 3rd of March in the Exhibition Hall in ‘Jim the Penman.’ He did not appear, although he was in Geelong, and next morning he published a letter stating that he was not aware till he arrived in Geelong that he was to appear ; that his consent had not been asked for or obtained ; and that a lawsuit was pending between the parties. When the company assembled for rehearsal Mr Murray appeared on the boards, and claiming that he had an interest in the company, endeavored to direct the members. A scene occurred between Messrs St. Maur and Murray, the latter being looked upon as a trespasser. Mr Murray, knowing that a warrant was issued against him, appeared on the stage at the evening performance for the purpose of bringing matters to a head. He was then arrested on a charge of trespass, and will appear at the Police Court to-morrow. He was admitted to bail. A dispute as to partnership accounts is said to be the cause of the unpleasantness.” A later telegram stated that the charge had been dismissed, but the facts connected with Mr Murray’s recent history go to strongly prove that his opinion as a critic is not worth having.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GSCCG18910317.2.8

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Gisborne Standard and Cook County Gazette, Volume IV, Issue 583, 17 March 1891, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
323

Untitled Gisborne Standard and Cook County Gazette, Volume IV, Issue 583, 17 March 1891, Page 2

Untitled Gisborne Standard and Cook County Gazette, Volume IV, Issue 583, 17 March 1891, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert