RAITHBY v. CLIFORD.

Inangahua Times, Volume V, Issue 55, 12 July 1878, Page 2

RAITHBY v. CLIFORD.

TO THE KDIT '11 OV TUB TIMIN. jJm,— .Tho thnnki of tho c immunity are due to you for the pin< you liuro t»keti to lay beloro tho ptiblio the lull details tin elicited in the above rase, Your contemporary started with a great splnsli to report tho e«oe, but i» would soern Hint s» soon ns tho cuse took an unpleasant turn nnd the real diets involved were cone mo, the Jlcrahl became aignifioniitly silen'* Tlio revelHtion.i nndo in tho C'lao will afford a very «ood reason for your contemporary's silence, in tho matter, but thanks to you. Sir, the fnctn are now out and people have nn opportunity of juilrhik of the whole job. The proprietors of that journn) Kavini» admitted on a former oe* casion that tlmt paper had tjiven inform i« tion concernii>K tho Defiance shares which was utterly false, otto could hardly expect anything like impartiality from it in nporting tho late ease, anl I only refer to tho matter now to show to what depths fournali.tm can be brotiabt by tlesiuninu men- Tru«tinf» that, you will, for the nal'cfey nn.l honor of the district, persevere in tho honest nnd outspoke-?) poJiey which has throuqhoui characterised tho policy of the Times. 1 am, &c, MoiIALtTT. Hcoft©n,.7i»iT 11th, 1878.