Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MISCELLANEOUS.

— ♦- • Mr Jostiee Williams gave judgment on Thursday npon the appeal cue Aiteheson ». The Waitaki Council, d'«» missing the appeal, with costs. The decision is one that relieves eonnty council of what would hsre been a burden much greater than they could bear, - bad the view urged on behalf of the appellant been sustained, for it was do less than that county councils should be required at any cost whatever to prevent > natural watercourses from overflowing K titeir banks in time of flood. Under the beadinß of New Decisions — Winding»up— Judicature Act, 1873— a company took out a /summons in the —Enforcing Compromise— We take the ** following from a legal paper j— A creditor of a winding*up te enforce his security. Negotiations for a compromise having -^ taken place, the summons was ordered to % stand over generally, to be restored to the list on applications. A. compromise was agreed upon and A sanctioned by the judge. The cradilor^ not having fully carried out the terms of the agreement, . the liquidator took put a summons in the winding*up to enforce it.— Hdd; that the creditor by his summons had submitted the determination of his rights to the court in the winding«np ; that, that-sum-mons was still a pending matter; and ~ that the court had jurisdiction to enforce the compromise against the creditor by summons in thewinding«up. The will of the Dowager Lady Rash* leigb, who died in South Devon, Eng- ** land, last year, aged 98, has been the subject of enquiry in the English Probate Court. The old lady, hiving an arertion to lawyers, had disposed of a fortune of about £30,000 upon a sheet of notepaper, which, 'after her death, was founi to have been split in two and stitched together. The question was whether the first piece, by which her nephew (since deceased, and now ap« pearing by bis widow) was appointed w residuary legatee, was written at the time the will was signed and attested, The jury found for the will in its entirety.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/IT18800816.2.9

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Inangahua Times, Volume II, 16 August 1880, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
334

MISCELLANEOUS. Inangahua Times, Volume II, 16 August 1880, Page 3

MISCELLANEOUS. Inangahua Times, Volume II, 16 August 1880, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert