A BRIEF REPLY.
\OO\-r---[to the editor of the standard.] Sir, — I do not think I am called upon tp say anything. more after the explanation you gave m last night's Standard. It' the house was " bought by a man named Russell," then of course the Times' eulogiums on the performance cau be accounted for. But what dependence can lie placed on such an authority m future? Your explanation is to my mind ample, and I think < does you credit. Had the Times been m; your place it would have been a little different for the poor "stars." I maintain we will never get good entertainments m Palmers ton while this systeen of ".buying houses" prevails Nor can we ever know whether newspaper reports from a certain source are trustworthy, or merely puffing up a Speculation of somebody or other. 1 again hope; that the next Company that visits us will be m better hands, and make a more creditable appearauce. — lam, &c, . : , i :! One of the Public.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MS18831128.2.41.1
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Manawatu Standard, Volume 4, Issue 306, 28 November 1883, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
167A BRIEF REPLY. Manawatu Standard, Volume 4, Issue 306, 28 November 1883, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in