NON-UNIONIST WORKERS.
ARBITRATION JUDGMENT. HOW EMPLOYERS CAN BE SAFEGUARDED. Per Press Association. CHRISTCHURCH, Dec. 7. “Before a non-unionist boot operative is engaged, must an employer first make application to the union to ascertain whether any unemployed unionists of equal ability willing to undertake the work are available?” As the result of an application by the Inspector of Awards, this question has been considered by Mr Justice Frazer, President of the Arbitration Court. “The preference clause of this award is worded in a somewhat unusual manner,” lie states, in the course of his judgment. “The clause does not expressly state that an employer must make such inquiries, but the implication is clear that he is expected first to ascertain from the union whether such a worker is available. If he does not make the inquiry, and it appears that the union liad on its unemployed list a unionist worker of equal ability willing to undertake the work, he commits a breach of the award. When, for any reason, it is inconvenient for an employer to make inquiry of the union, he can safeguard himself by requiring a prospective employee to become a member of the union before he engages him.”
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MS19261208.2.30
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Manawatu Standard, Volume XLVII, Issue 9, 8 December 1926, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
199NON-UNIONIST WORKERS. Manawatu Standard, Volume XLVII, Issue 9, 8 December 1926, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Manawatu Standard. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.