Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

Thursday, December sth, 18JF$, (Before R. Ward, Esq., R.M.) Tl^ere vrai no criminal business. ■- CIVIL QABK3. A. and T. Stace t. William Monks— Claim, £1? 16a 4d. Mr Staite appeared for plaintiff and Mr Samuels for defendant. ! The case hinged upon a receipt produced which the plaintiff's counsel asserted haji been tampered with. Before, howeyer, any . such accusation was hinted at, the dopvynent was handed up. to the Bench, and after one glance Mr Ward drew attention to, the fact '—indeed, wai Ijhja, first to, speak of the matter. The receipt had been— according 1, to, th^e evyiencer— given. for.£4, but as it appeal m, Court it was for £l4, the "teen" and a figure, of " V being m quite.' different ink. > ' •■ Mr Samue& produced, the defendant, who swore moat strongly that ht haji paid Mr Alfred Stace £14, by a £4 cheque dpd two JBo-notesj. that he, had. never, altered the receipt, npi had it been,' altered; to his knowledge, and although, he. was. submitted •■ to a rigid examination by Mr. Staite^, he. adhered steadfastly to thp statement. ' : Jjh, denial, Mr Sjiaite. put Mr A UiefA S.tpce ; into the box, ■^n.o l sjfoire,.tnafc he remembered ' distinctly giving the. receipt m, question ■ which was for, £4 ;.' that it vras a 'cheque from Peter itanson,;. that he. never received, the £lO,extra, and; that; he. would, swear' : most positively the receipt had; been tami pered with,sipc% i 4 U«l been. wnj;tenj In \ pro'pf of the. fact that the sum. paid .was £4, and; not £14, lie produped his, day book, with the entry wliiph. had been made at the. time. ; Aftei} counsel on. both sides, had ad-, dressed) the. Court at some length, . The Magistrate said he. had not the slightest doubt on his own mind, that the repeipt had been giyen.for £4, and that \he. £10 had not been paid. He would there-, fore giye judgment for that amount, wjth costs. '■ ' ' Robert Maelrie. x> Joe Lanlco — Clajtn, £4 6s. 11s, for meat supplied. Defcndanjt did not appear, and judgtnent was given for amount claimed ex, ■parj.e.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MT18781207.2.7

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Manawatu Times, Volume III, Issue 11, 7 December 1878, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
348

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Manawatu Times, Volume III, Issue 11, 7 December 1878, Page 2

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Manawatu Times, Volume III, Issue 11, 7 December 1878, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert