THE NEW INTERESTING FACTS.
To the Editor. Sin, — I perused your contempor* ary last evening in the hope that I *wcmld find at leastsome to -reply to the damaging facts I set out in iny previous letter. The only thing*! could see, hbifoV6rf*«wi»*k letter, bearing the signature " Be« hind the Scenes,'' in which writer had "drawn a bow "at * venture." It is satisfactory to know that he has missed his mark, andtbar he feels the atiing of > >*my anonymous remarks There is no mistaking the writer of s the letter signed " Behind the Scenes^? The venom is of a dintinctire character, and this ,is only one of the many aliases of my friend. The question, however, not who I am, but whether my facts are correct, and his silence in this respget is strikingly suggestive. ... I am no w waiting to see ttiose dummies taken out. It is evident that.!, my last stroke struck a raw spot, bnt^s may inform him that I -have, a lash in reserve which will cut to the very bone. In order to give him some clue as to my personality I may in* form him I submitted a copy of your paper in which iny .letter appeared to a Wanganui friend, whoinformed me of a little incident which is vverjf suggestive as to the genuineness of even those " outside " advertiser raents. He states that the* canvA ser of this paper, went :to him is I Wanganui and asked .him f at ,*alf ! order to insert his a&y^jMifcimt. Hedeclined the honor, and^hjonght | rib more about it till & iew^mon^m later when the canvasser again f ajyj peared and asked for the^advertase* ment on the ground that the paper had been publishing it for the last three months ! At the same time ha produced a copy of the paper, showing the advertisement for tTChich *h6 solicited an order. MyMendN&ldrora that so far from giving him an order he would be glad to see his named remove from the columns of of such a seedy looking rag. Then the canvasser turned collector, and demanded payment for the-* i three months during which the advertise* ment appeared. My friendHCOuld not stand this attempt to blackmail^ and the interview terminated; lolfhf* what suddenly. I have no however, that the same gam&'liitii been played; with Bucees^/^nJ oxitP&jfr two occasions. I enclose c JniMi of ; the person I have referugi.loi^^l you; may depend uponfthe -iprrecfei ness of the information. Perhaps your contemporary will be-aUel to follow up this clue, thjdughJiorl mustf ■ #?: again remind 1 ?I -«fifin that the main question is as to the correctness of my state* ments., ; If anyone will" c'ompare^th* twp papers of Saturday ifisJE they/mil find that iny statements are absolutely correct, and it is positively refresh* to note, that even the writer signing* himself "Behind theJScenesw*' in his letter to the editor of the Standard (that's himself) alludes to the /aa« vertisements I mentioned as " your dummy advertisements." • .? j' I am &c., - ; A Business Majt. .
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MT18831205.2.9.1
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Manawatu Times, Volume IX, Issue 1119, 5 December 1883, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
498THE NEW INTERESTING FACTS. Manawatu Times, Volume IX, Issue 1119, 5 December 1883, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
 Log in
Log in