DUNEDIN.
Oct 10, <r .- r 'The "Divorce Court will holjl; : a fitting-' next. week,', when"; pß*. ? W . *"' ' Ne winan" and Eliza Newman • and Alfred Hodden for a rule nisi for disaolutidrfof inarriagewill be heard. The petitioner \vas : married to the -, respondent m 1865, and lived kith '.•^er.at&wkesbury : :B'jsh till" 1874, " ( and there were four children as the issue of the marriage. The > petitioner alleges that his wife then .cohabited with the co-respondent; :Andhas since iesided with him' 1 at < ' jifchfe' Waimate.. - .-; ,\ a; ; j «s ...In Higgins v.,. Land Board, an "Appeal froni a decision of -the bbafd Jin forfeitiog Appellant's license,. pn_ -ithe ground of dummyism, Judge "'Williams, m giviiig ' j uagmen t, i said was not liable to be j forfeited on the ground that t*>e licensee i- thad tfoeujtied .the land not exclusively tv ifor his'own^tse and benefit, although SfStwejce liable t.o be forfeited uhitliijH {ground, he was quijte satisfied that the (•yidence would justify a forfeiture. t ?.2Ehe. appeal was allowed, with costs.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MT18841013.2.14.6
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Manawatu Times, Volume X, Issue 1319, 13 October 1884, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
166DUNEDIN. Manawatu Times, Volume X, Issue 1319, 13 October 1884, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in