I.—l

3

4. That on the said 22nd day of December, the Beturning Officer indorsed on the said writ the name of Sir George Grey, X.C.8., as one of the persons duly elected, and returned the same to the Clerk of the Writs, who received the same on the 6th day of January, 1876. 5. That in pursuance of a writ dated the 6th day of December, i 875, duly issued, an election for the Thames Electoral District took place on the 10th day of January, 1876, and Sir George Grey was declared to be elected. 6. That on the 11th day of January, 1876, the Beturning Officer indorsed the name of Sir George Grey, X.C.8., ou the said writ, and returned the same to the Clerk of the Writs, who received the same on the 17th day of January, 1876. 7. That it appears by the law of Parliament that a person having been duly returned as a member for one district is ineligible for another district until his seat is vacated. 8. That the law of New Zealand makes no provision by which a member duly returned can after a General Election resign his seat before a Speaker of the House of Bepresentatives has been chosen. 9. That, according to the law of the Imperial Parliament, a person may be returned at a General Election for two places, aud has the option of choosing for which place he will sit. 10. That the reason for such law appears to be, that the writs for the Imperial Parliament are made returnable on "a future and by law a distinct and certain day (being the day on which Parliament is appointed to meet); and therefore within that time, though the Beturning Officer may transmit the writ to the Crown Office, he is not obliged to do so, nor will the law take notice of its being returned till the day on which it is made returnable. 11. That, by the law of New Zealand, the writs on a General Election are made returnable not on a certain day, but on or before a certain day ; and the Beturning Officers are required by law, after indorsing them with the names of the persons elected, to return the writs. 12. That the Beturning Officer having, on the 22nd day of December, 1875, indorsed on the writ for the District of Auckland City West the name of Sir George Grey, X.C.8., as the person duly elected in pursuance thereof, and the writ with such indorsement having been returned to and received by the Clerk of the Writs on the 6th day of January, 1876, Sir George Grey then became a member duly returned, and, not having vacated his seat, there being no law enabling him to do so, was ineligible for the District of the Thames on the 11th day of January, 1876, and therefore that his election and return for that district was void. Clauses 1 to 6 inclusive of Mr. Whitaker's motion were agreed to. Mr. Curtis proposed the following as an amendment, in lieu of clauses 7 to 12 inclusive: — The Committee have satisfied themselves by careful inquiry, that, by the law and practice of England, a person who has during a general election been elected a member of the House of Commons by one constituency is nevertheless eligible for election by another constituency until the date fixed for the return of the writs. There does not appear to the Committee to be anything in the law of New Zealand which differs from that of England to such an extent as to debar two or more constituencies from electing the same person during a general election. The Committee are therefore of opinion that Sir George Grey, X.C.8., was eligible as a candidate for the District of the Thames, and that his election for that district was in all respects valid and in accordance with law. The amendment being put, the Committee divided. Ayes, 6. Noes 1. Mr. Brandon, Mr. Whitaker. Mr. Curtis, Mr. Johnston, Mr. Stevens, Mr. Stout, Mr. Teschemaker. The amendment was therefore carried. Resolved, That the resolutions passed this day be reported to the House. The Committee then adjourned. By Authority : Geoege Didsbitey, Government Printer, Wellington. —1876. Price 3d.]