11

H.—l4

Galey's Cases. —There was ample room for doubt when the rolls were made up, and until the sitting of'the Eevision Court, as to whether these names belonged to Eden or Grey Lynn. The omission of Josephine Caley's name was brought about by the Caleys accidentally omitting her name from the order of the Court, and it would naturally mislead the Registrar in making up the special supplementary roll. He says that, taking the order of the Court as the basis for the supplementary roll, he would naturally overlook any names not included thereon. Spragg's Case. —This was the case mentioned in Charge No. 3 (Grey Lynn), and need not be further referred to in this place. Grudge's Case. —This was an application to transfer from Grey Lynn to Eden, and the Registrar marked it " Not approved," making a further minute to the effect that there was no time for erasing from Grey Lynn and transferring to Eden. In our opinion this is not a sufficient reason, and no other is offered. Fox's Case. —This case is dealt with in schedule under heading " Charge No. 1 " (City roll). It will be noticed that the only cases in this list which fall under the heading adopted by the complainants are Cromarty's, Caley's, and Spragg's, and in each of these cases there is no ground for alleging corrupt motive, even if the Registrar had been proved to have erred in his decision. Charge No. 8: That Persons applying for Enrolment on Grey Lynn were inserted on City Roll. This charge was abandoned as being substantially included in Charge No. 1. Chakge No. 1 (City Roll) : That Claims totalling Eighty in Number of Persons qualified to be on the City Roll were put in by Temperance Electoral Office, and none of such Persons' Names were inserted upon the said City Roll. Names and Addresses, and Dates of Claims; together with Registrar's Explanation and Commissioners' Comments. Boreham, Frank, Collingwood Street; sth November, 1902.—0n G.L. roll, No. 252. Wrong form ; reject. Boreham, Jane, Collingwood Street; sth November, 1902.—0n G.L. roll, No. 254. Wrong form ; Ann, Newton Road ; sth November, 1902.—0h G.L. roll, No. 405. Wrong form ; reject. Brown Letitia.—Presumed to be No. 1620, C.A. roll. No claim produced. Cordes, Elizabeth, St. Mary's Road, Ponsonby; sth November, 1902.—0n G.L. roll, No. 700. Wrong form; reject. Corrie Ellen. —Claim not produced. No information. Flynn, Elizabeth, 95, Nelson Street; 6th November, 1902. — Duplicate of C.A., No. 4712. Gavan, Janet Russell, Victoria Street; 4th November, 1902.—Duplicate of C.A., No. 5076. Rejected. Gorrie, Sarah.—Claim not produced. No information. Holland, John, Wellington Street.—Duplicate of C.A., No. 6715. Rejected. Hardy Robert, Picton Street; 30th October, 1902.—0n G.L. roll, No. 1480. Rejected. Hardy! Robert, Picton Street; 11th November, 1902.—0n G.L. roll, No. 1480. Rejected. Lawson, Amelia, Nelson Street.—This case is specially and separately dealt with by us infra. Meek, Charles Henry, Somerset Place, off Howe Street; 6th November, 1902.—0n G.L. roll, No 2245. Wrong form ; reject. Meek, Elizabeth Jane, Somerset Place, off Howe Street; 6th November, 1902.—0n G.L. roll, No 2246. Wrong form ; reject. Mumford, Easton Hunter, Cobden Street; 7th November, 1902. Duplicate of C.A., No. 17122. Matthews, Horace.—Probably a mistake for "Florence Matthews," No. 19358, C.A. roll. No claim produced. No evidence. _ McMillan, Jessie, Wellington Place; 6th November, 1902.—Confused with Jessie McMillan, No. 3595, Parnell. Mistaken identity. Rae Elizabeth, Costley Street.—On C.A. roll as No. 11914. Claim not produced. Robinson William Leo, Abbott's Road.—On C.A. roll as No. 19889. Claim not produced. Raineer Charles Sentinel Road, Ponsonby ; 10th November, 1902.—Claim marked " Treat as transfer. Erase from Parnell roll, 4076." Erased from Parnell. Not on City roll. Reader Caroline —Claim not produced. No evidence. Reed, Rebecca, Edinburgh Street, Newton ; , 1902.—Duplicate of C.A., No. 12055. Reiected ; form and date incomplete. Skelton, G. h'.—Said to be identical with Edward Harold Skelton, No. 19998, C.A. Claim not qhip£ r °Ma°eie Boston Road.—Said to be No. 13043, C.A. Claim not produced. wSteheath Hattie, Cook Street; 6th November, 1902.-On G.L. roll as No. 3471. Williams L R Scott Great North Road.—On C.A. roll as No. 19960. Claim not produced. Brown, Peter Samuel, Norfolk Street, Ponsonby; 28th October, 1902.—Police report he is in Te Aroha " Not satisfied as to residence ; reject." Boyce, John James, Salisbury Street, Ponsonby; 28th October, 1902.—0n G.L. roll as No. 271. Wrong form ; reject. CrumDton Thomas, Prospect Terrace; 28th October, 1902.—Police report he cannot be found. "Reject." N.B.—They seem to have confused Prospect Street with Prospect Terrace, which are in different electorates.