Page image
Page image

H.—ll

XXXIV

Other Decisions (re Interpretations, &c.)

Cases under The Workers' Compensation for Accidents Act during the Year ending 31st March, 1904.

Summary. Industrial agreements ... ... ... ... ... ... 19 Conciliation Board. Recommendations ... ... ... ... ... 13 Interpretations (by Chairman of Board) ... ... ... 2 Arbitration Court. Awards ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 25 Enforcements of awards ... ... ... ... ... ... 121 Other applications (interpretations, &c.) ... ... ... ... 21 Workers compensation for accidents ... ... ... ... 19 Total cases before Conciliation Boards... ... ... ... 15 Total cases before Arbitration Court (including those brought under the Workers' Compensation for Accidents Act) ... ... 167 Reports of the cases mentioned in this return are printed in the Books of Awards, and the Decisions under the Workers' Compensation for Accidents Act.

Trade Affected. Application. Industrial Distriot. Auckland Furniture Trade Taranaki Letterpress Interpretation Judgment re application for enforcement To set aside expert's report Order of the Court re extending agreeNorthern. Taranaki. Christchurch Tailoring Trade „ Tinsmiths Canterbury. a Canterbury Tanners, &c. „ Timber-yards Taranaki Letterpress ment Interpretation Employment of youths as firemen ... Decision re payment for holidays ... „ re regulation of hours „ re registration a Taranaki. it •'' • • • Shipmasters' Association Wellington. Wanganui Carpenters ... Inangahua Gold-miners... Otago Timber-yards Otago Tramways Otago Dredgemen Otago Brickmakers „ replace for payment of wages „ re cyanide-workers To alter terms of award ... // Westland. Otago and Southland. a • • • a a * • • a Interpretation a Wellington Seamen (New Zealand) „ (Australasian) Otago Brickmakers „ Metal-workers Nelson Carpenters a • • • • • • ' • • a • • • •'' it Wellington. Otago and Southland, a • • • • • ■ No jurisdiction ... a Nelson.

District. Case. Decision. ■ Nelson Eevell v. Eout McCartney v. Grant Seaton v. Greymouth-Point Elizabeth Eailway and Coal Company Hughes v. the Unity Gold-dredging Company Attwood v. Smith Bros. ... Hill v. the New Zealand Coal and Oil Company McKay v. Hayes and Gillon... Hughes v. the Union Steamship Company McCrossan v. Barton Phillips v. Seager ... Anderson v. Union Steamship Company Teal v. Stevens Molloy v. Morrison .. 6s. per week from 24/9/1902. £10 10s. £210s. per fortnight from 9/1/1902. Westland ... Otago and Southland £400. » Dismissed. £200. a Wellington a it a ' • • it a £25, in addition to amount already paid. £1 4s. 3d. per week from 28/5/1903. £1 4s. per week from 6/4/1903. 4s. per week from 21/3/1903. 2s. per week from 7/1/1903. Dismissed. 2s. 6d. per week from 28/5/1903, and £82 4s. 8d. Dismissed. 12s. per week for fifteen weeks. £5. £18 18s. £100. £375 14s. a ■■• a a a Levett v. Bignall ... Smith v. Griffin Andrews v. Gammon and Gammon Eink v. Nathan and Co. Humffreys v. Murray Barrowman v. New Greenstone Golddredging Company Marlborough Westland ...

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert