I.—6a.
70
[c. w. mcvilly
not that show some defect in the system?—No, it simply shows thai certain recommendations were made and acted upon. Take No. 3: as I stilted the other day, No. 3 went to the Appeal Board and lost his case. He has never been recoi ended for it position thai has been vacant. No. 9 was not recommended at the time for the position that was vacant. Nos. II and 15 were men occupying positions thai were considered to be special positions and to be worth more than the positions occupied by Nos. :l and 9, and they were not shifted out of the positions they occupied. They had special qualifications and training. 39. But you see that one year two men are put ahead of two other men, and the next scar those two men are put back again. Does not that appear to be peculiar?—No, it does not. It is merely an illustration of the fact that the Department does not want to do an injustice to any man, and if it is shown at any time that a mistake has been made the Department is prepared to rectify it. Although those two officers, Nos. 3 and 9, were not recommended at the time, there was considerable correspoinleuee as a result id' their complaints, and they were put back in their proper positions because the Traffic Manager stated that, although lie could not recommend them for the positions held by Nos. 11 and 15, he considered the positions they were then occupying should be paid for at the same rate as the other two men. We rectified that straight away. Had he siiid at the outset that the positions wele worth the money, then the men would have been put up at the time. 40. lie changed his mind in twelve months?— Correspondence was going on the whole time. 41. Well, would they be given a satisfactory reason?— That I cannot say. 1 cannot say whether they regarded the reason as satisfactory. They got the reason so far as the Department w :ts concerned. 42. But would not the reason that was given merely amount to a statement that they were not considered competent for the position.' That possibly was so, but then it is their business to find out from their immediate superior officer in what way In- was not satisfied with them. We always tell the man immediately in control to advise those concerned, and he should give the specific reason. Ido not know what is in the mind of the Traffic Manager tit Invercargill if he does not recommend you. I would tell you you were not recommended, but at the same time that I told you that I should want to know from him the reason why, and I should tell him to tell you the reason, but I cannot read what is in the mind of the men. 43. Is it not a fact thai the Managers do not give any further reason than merely to state that the man is not considered efficient .' - i have already told the Committee that the Department tells tiie man whenever he asks the question. Win-never tin- Manager or responsible officer brings the matter before the Department and says, " What are we to do?" we say, " Advise the man that he was not recommended for so-and-so. and give him reasons," and the instructions State that the men are to be given reasons. 44. And if they do not do that, is not that another defect in the system of dealing with promotions?— There is the human equation again. We provide rules and regulations for the working of tin- Department; we know that certain men from time to time commit breaches of those rules which result in certain things happening, but that is not a defect in the .system —that is the human equation. That is simply the result of a man not carrying out his instructions, and you cannot hold the system responsible for the failure of those men to carry out their instructions. 45. Another case quoted was No. 180 in grade i y . I think it is admitted he went over the heads of a large number of men?— Yes. 46. He was not on the staff of any District Officer, was he? —No, he was not on the staff of a District Officer. 47. And he passetl over the heads of a large number of men who had been recommended tor promotion by District Officers? —Yes. 48. Well, as to any reasons in that ease, the District officers could not Ik expected to say more than that a man was net considered to be efficient. They could only repeat the reason they got from tin- Head Office m that case?— Well, thej were told by the Head Office. 1 know the particular position you are referring to, and I should like to say this : that, as the man who is responsible I'm- the carrying-out of the routine work of flu- Head Office, 1 recommended for the position the officer who, in my opinion, was the best qualified and best trained for the position that was vacant iit the time, the man who had spent till his service at the particular work in the Head Office, who knew nothing whatever about station accounts, but a man who was absolutely the best fitted and the only man who could take up the particular work of that position—that is, the only man except seniors in the office —and I made that perfectly clear to the Appeal Board when the question was before tin- Board. It was made so clear that the man who did appeal asked permission to withdraw after the ease had been gone mi with, and 1 raised no objection to that course. Anybody else who Wits passed over, and every man who asked, so far as we were concerned, was told through the District Officer distinctly that they were not considered to have the qualifications which would enable them to take up the duty of that particular clerk. p.). But the particular qualifications required were not exceptional, were they: it was not pointed out to those officers in which particular respect they were deficient, so that they could qualify for such a position? —How many officers know anything about recording.' 50. Members in all district offices know about recording they have recording work to do there? Yes, but to a limited extent. 1 know the member who appealed thought he knew all about it—he had been through a district office, but I wits soon able to convince the Appeal Board thai he knew nothing aboul it. The system is altogether different in ti large office. Everywhere you find that in the large offices your Record Clerk is a specialist who is trained right up to it and who is kept there all his time, and that is what he is there for. 51. Mr. Boss.] Sometimes he has to do the work when he is a cadet? —Well, he is trained to do it. 1 know this particular man started copying letters, as others have done, and he has been there all the time. If I were to ring up and ask for a special paper in connection with a matter
Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.
By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.
Your session has expired.