Page image
Page image

1.—7

159

" If the main point of this scheme were taken up the Government commandeering all the freezing-works and abattoirs, the necessary working and business details could soon be put in shape by a conference of, say, a representative from each of the freezing-works. " B Scheme. " Government to be sole exporters of frozen meats. Meat to be bought as at present (hook prices). Government to retain all hides, fat, skins, offal, sundries, &c. Offices opened in London to deal direct with retailer. Net profits returned pro rata to suppliers of stock. Same principle- o administration as in Scheme A, Freezing companies to be paid working-expenses only, and shareholders to receive their pre-war dividend."

Friday, 2 Ist September, 1917. Henry George Warren sworn and examined. (No. 27.) 1. The Chairman.] You are here on behalf of Nelson Bros. (Limited). What is your position with the firm?—l am secretary for New Zealand of Nelson Bros. (Limited). The head office is at Tomoana, near Hastings. . 2. You know the object of this inquiry : we are investigating generally into the meat industry, more especially 'with regard to the menace, or alleged menace, of the American Meat Trust. Have you any general statement you would care to make from your own point of view I One should be'very careful not to fall into the mistake of accepting hearsay statements of private individuals or companies. As far as my own company is concerned, we have lots ot hearsay statements, but no actual evidence except that one firm has come out in its own name in NewZealand. That is the only straight-out evidence we have that there is any firm connected with the meat trade in America operating in this country. 3. Is your company a local one, or where are the shares held?—lt is an English company. 4. Any shares held in New Zealand ?—Yes, a certain number. I cannot tell you exactly now many. ... , 5. Are you a buying company, or do you freeze on owners account I—We are a miying company, and we also freeze on account of owners. We buy when it suits us. 6. Have you any farmer shareholders? —Yes. , 7 During last season how did you find competition in your district ?—Very keen indeed 8. With what result?—l think the general result was that people, if they wanted to buy, often had to pay more for stock than it was worth. 9 Was this brought about by any particular competition, or by general competition .i—l suppose you might call it general 'competition, because if one buyer gives more for stock all the others have to come up to him if they want the stock. 10. And that position actually existed?— Yes, certainly. 1] Mr W 11 Field.] Do you regard the American competition as a serious and growing menace'to this country, and especially to the meat industry'--That all depends how much of a hold the Americans have of the market and the business at this end. We know they have control of the frozen-meat market in London. It is rather difficult to answer the question. If they got complete control here they would be a very serious menace, but I do not see how they are going °12. Do the freezing companies view American competition here with alarm?—l think that genera you say that you do not think they can control the market here? --I do not think the Americans can buy up all the meat companies _ N. But they have plenty of money for the purpose?— Yes, but Ido not think it would be possible to do it. ~ „ ~ 15 Why not?— Because I do not think the companies would sell out to them. 16' Would they sell out if they were offered sufficient money?—A large number of the meat companies here arc farmers' companies, owned by farmers, and I do not think the farmers JSKS out to then, because they fear the result of the Americans getting control of the trade here. 17 But a number of the companies are not owned by the farmers J—lhat is so. 18' And it would be a question of cash with them?—lt might be with some companies 19' If the Americans bought out a number of the bigger companies here, could they not close down the smaller companies by paying higher prices and adopting the methods adopted by (lie Americans in other countries?— With unlimited capital? 20 Yes practically unlimited?-! suppose thai end could be effected without actually buying tbeworkSf tney wanted to do it they could do it?—l suppose with unlimited capital they could do anything. , 22 But you do not think they will?—No, Ido not. 23 Do you think it is unnecessary for this Government, in conjunction with the Imperial Government, to take any action in connection with this matter at present?-That is rather a S, est ion to answer. 1 do not think that if the condition of things gets serious here it md 11 advisable. lam always thinking of the position in England where the Americans have id. a verb g control now, and are apparently going to retain it. The proportion of meat going from this country is such a very small one compared with the amount used in England.

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert