Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RANGITAIKI LANDS.

—_— ■■■■___»— .— ■_.- APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATOR RECLASSIFICATION* SCHEME. An interesting official pronouncement i? made by the Government in regard to the Rangitaiki lands. j The Rangitaiki Land Drainage Act, 1910, did not provide for the reclassification of the lands for the purpose of rates, and, at the request of a large body of ratepayers, legislation was passed last session, authorising a reclassification. The first classification was made shortly after the commencement of the drainage operations, when it was obviously impossible to determine to what extent they would affect the various properties in the area. It is now considered that the work has progressed sufficiently far to enable the classification to be more accurately determined. Under the original Act, I the lands were classified under three classes, and arbitrators were appointed to grade them, as follows: —(a) Lands that will receive direct 'benefit therefrom; (b) lands that will receive less benefit therefrom; (c) lands that will receive only indirect benefit therefrom. In the 1923 amendment, a fourth class was added: —(d) Lands that will receive only an indirect benefit therefrom, but which, on account of their situation or physical condition, should not, in the opinion of the arbitrators, be classified under (c). This was added, in response -t,o representations, and the Government hoped that, upon a reclassification of the area, it would have the effect of apportioning the rates more equitably. Xew regulations now authorise the ratepayers to call a meeting and appoint an arbitrator. Upon receipt of advice that this has been done, the Government will appoint its arbitrator, who, if necessary, shall appoint some disinterested person as umpire, to decide points in dispute.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19240115.2.80

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Auckland Star, Volume 55, Issue 12, 15 January 1924, Page 6

Word count
Tapeke kupu
273

RANGITAIKI LANDS. Auckland Star, Volume 55, Issue 12, 15 January 1924, Page 6

RANGITAIKI LANDS. Auckland Star, Volume 55, Issue 12, 15 January 1924, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert