Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

QUESTION OF COST

TAR SEALING OF PAKOWHAI ROAD. COUNTY'S ACTION ENDORSED. An explanation of the action the council has taken in regard to the sealing of the Pakowhai road was delivered at the meeting of the Hawke's Bay County Council to-day by the chairman, Mr F. B. Logan. Mr Logan remarked that some ratepayers were exercised in their minds because the council, after stating that it preferred a liot-mix surface to a tar-seal coat, proceeded with the laying of a tarseal coat, although the TTighways Board declared that it had no objection to a hotmlx surfacing. In this regard the chairman stated : — 'Un connection with the bitumen surface of the Pakowhai road _ the Main Highways Board was willing that a liot mix surface should be put down, on condition that the Hawke's Bay County Council paid the differenc© between the cost of a sealed surface and a hot mix surface. "The three-coat sealed surface costs approximately £1600 a mile, of which the council's share would he £400. The hot mix surface costs approximately £4400 a mile, of which the council's share would be £3200 _or £2800 a mile niore than that which was decided on. "Under those conditions the council felt it was not advisable to put down a hot mix surface. "The cost wouhl have been too great," hQ remarked.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DTN19300310.2.30.6

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Daily Telegraph (Napier), Volume 59, Issue 32, 10 March 1930, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
221

QUESTION OF COST Daily Telegraph (Napier), Volume 59, Issue 32, 10 March 1930, Page 5

QUESTION OF COST Daily Telegraph (Napier), Volume 59, Issue 32, 10 March 1930, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert