Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article text has been partially corrected by other Papers Past users. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SUPREME COURT

COMING SESSION DIVORCE AND CIVIL CASES The following cases have been set down for hearing at the Supreme Court session which opens on Tuesday next: DIVORCE. (Before a Judge and Jury of Twelve.) Robert Alexander Robertson v. Edith Mary Robertson and another, alleged adultery; Lily Lavinia Martin v. Frank Edward Shaw Martin, alleged adultery (judicial separation). (Before a Judge alone.) Muriel Eileen Gertrude Chichester v. Frank Charles Chichester, alleged desertion; Constance Irene Gretta Davidson v. David Davidson, alleged desertion; Herbert Denham v. Olive Louisa Denham, alleged desertion; Sylvia Constance Norman v. Philip Vigot Norman, alleged separation; John Richard Bowen Hogg Dennis Mair v. Annie Jane Mair, alleged desertion; Charles George Gordon Trevethick v. Ethel May Treethick, alleged desertion; Rachel Bork v. August Carl Bork, alleged desertion; Mabel Annie Alice Kate Haines v. Edwin Jarvis Haines, alleged desertion; Eva Gerard v. Francis Gerard, alleged desertion; Hilda Daisy Howard v. George James Howard, alleged desertion; Robert Duncan v. Kathleen Edith Hammond Duncan, alleged desertion; Percy Richardson v. Barbara Richardson, alleged separation; Vonnie Dolores Hodson v. Alick Colin Hodson, alleged separation; Grace Ainsworth v. Gerald Allen Ainsworth, alleged desertion; Daisy Heimdal v. Fridolf Mauritz Heimdal, alleged desertion; James Joseph Cronin v. Ethel Cronin, alleged separation; Elizabeth Borman v. Grant Borman, alleged desertion; Herbert Charles Bacon v. Jane Elizabeth Bacon, alleged separation; Stanley Broughton Pilcher v. Eugenie Christine Pilcher, alleged separation; Nellie Turvey v. Edward Turvey, alleged separation; Edith May M'Alistor v. George M'Alister, alleged separation; Henry James Douglas v. Mary Agnes Gertrude Geraldine Douglas, alleged separation; James Hallinam v. Clarice Margaret Hallinam, alleged separation or desertion (cross petition, alleged desertion); Darcy Raymond Hogan v. Vivian Beatrice Jane Hogan, alleged desertion; Harold Percival Bishop v. Ida Alexandre Belle Bishop, alleged separation; Marion Emeline Winifred Mears v. Joseph Arthur Mears, alleged separation; Emma Gertrude Cox v. Francis Charles Cox, alleged separation; Florence Muriel Woolcott v. Tasman Charles Stephen Woolcott, alleged adultery; Nellie May O'Neill v. James Stephen O'Neill, alleged separation; Ivyleen Jessie Smith v. Richard Benjamin Carter Smith, alleged desertion; Louisa Florence Weinberg v. John Alfred Weinberg, alleged separation; James Martin v. Gladys Margaret Martin, restitution of conjugal rights; Reginald George Baker v. Ethel Alva Baker, restitution of conjugal rights. CIVIL. (Before a Judge and Common Jury of Twelve.) Roland Cobden Watson and others v. The Bell Bus Company, £1000 damages for alleged negligence. Margaret Ellen Motley v. William Elliott and others, £1348 11s damages for injuries allegedly received. Thomas Nash v. William Henry Nash, £400 damages for alleged libel. Sidney Walter Webb v. Percy Revell, £679 0s 4d damages for injuries allegedly received. Murdoch Alexander M'Beth v. J. H. Heron, £204 12s 10d damages for injuries allegedly received. Leonard Lyulph Darke v. Black and White Cabs, Ltd., £1643 19s damages for injuries allegedly received. (Before a Judge alone.) Michael Power v. H.M. The King, £2150 damages for alleged wrongful dismissal. Bennett, Limited, v. E. Reynolds and Co., Limited (Societe Anonyme Automobiles M. Berliet, third party), £152 10s for work allegedly done. Lottie Isabel Harris (as executrix of the will of Charlotte Harris) v. Tobacconists, Ltd., £653 19s, alleged breach of contract. Counterclaim, declaration, etc. The Hardy Patent Pick Co., Ltd., v. B. J. Dunsheath, Ltd., possession of chattels and £200 damages. Counterclaim, £200 damages for alleged wrongful entry and removal. Lottie Isabel Harris (as executrix of the will of Charlotte Harris) v. Bertie Smith, return of chattels and £500 damages. Janet Winifred Taylor v. Lily Lawrance and others, declaration, etc. Emily Edith Maude Jude v. Leonard Richard Downman Benjamin, declaration, etc. Counterclaim, declaration, etc. Henry Schneideman v. Philip Schneideman, £1230 19s 10d allegedly had and received. Counterclaim, £1275 5s 6d allegedly due. Hector John Clark v. Hugh Capon, £50 damages for alleged seduction. Moore, Wilson, and Co., Ltd., v Oswald M. Smith and Co., Ltd., £431 16s 9d, alleged breach of contract. Mabel Constance Alice Cullen v. Cephas John Cullen, declaration, etc Thomas Taylor v. James George Davies, £250, alleged breach of agreement. Miriam Zimmerman v. Christina Hannah Butler, specific performance. David Milligan v. Frank William Bedford, £800, alleged breach of agreement. Louis Brough v. The Ocean Accident and Guarantee Corporation, Ltd., and another, £250 damages for alleged slander. A. D. Kennedy and Co., Ltd., v. William Hannann, £750, commission allegedly due. Ann Eliza Currie and another v. The Public Trustee (as administrator of the estate of James Currie, deceased), declaration, etc. Maurice Goldsborough v. Heretaunga Bricks (N.Z.), Ltd., £512 10s, allegedly due under agreement. Counter-claim, £364 13s 5d, allegedly received and not accounted for. Thomas Hensman Caverhill v. Combined Buyers, Ltd., and others, injunction. Ernest William Giesen v. Annie Deckston, £143 12s 9d, allegedly due under agreement. John Priestley and another v. George Alexander Martin, £350 damages for alleged fraudulent representation. John George Hankins v. The New Zealand Loan and Mercantile Agency Co., Ltd., £750 damages for alleged wrongful dismissal and accounts. The C. and A. Odlin Timber and Hardware Co., Ltd., v. W. Homer, £415, allegedly lent. Thomas Harris v. Thomas Richardson, declaration, etc. Sydney Vernon Walker v. John William Telford, £250, allegedly due on promissory note. Counter-claim, £50, allegedly paid. Martha Sinclair v. The Public Trustee (as executor of the will of Duncan Henry Hibbs Sinclair), £1000, allegedly lent. Walter Harold Mill v. Wellington City Council, £500 damages for injuries allegedly received. Arthur Pitt Porutu and another v. Sarah Peck, declaration, etc. Edith Sheridan v. Margaret M'Kenzie, possession. Gordon Henry Belcher v. Edith M'Cormack and another, £758 damages for injuries allegedly received. Donald M'Leod v. John Frederick Forrester and others, order for sale, etc. Tho Official Assignee in Bankruptcy v. Eva Maud Foote, declaration, etc. Charles Henry, Lockhart Tucker v.

William John Albert Nesbitt, £500 damages for alleged misrepresentation. William Dean Smith and another v. Jane Mary Tiller, £297, alleged false representation. George Hamilton Scott v. The American Trading Company of Australia, £209, alleged breach of contract. George Hamilton Scott v. William Stewart, declaration, etc.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19281026.2.103

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Evening Post, Volume CVI, Issue 90, 26 October 1928, Page 11

Word count
Tapeke kupu
986

SUPREME COURT Evening Post, Volume CVI, Issue 90, 26 October 1928, Page 11

SUPREME COURT Evening Post, Volume CVI, Issue 90, 26 October 1928, Page 11

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert