Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE HOUBE OF LORDS.

United Press Association—Copyright LONDON,June 27. Mr. Lloyd George enumerated tlio Bills the House of Lords had obstructed anti .mutilated, ihe only instance wherein it was justified by the rieauel was the rejection ot Mr. Gladstone’s Home Rule Bill, but this would not have fared better had -Hr H C. Bannermans present plan been in operation in 18TO, .m.ismuch as although the Act, received the Royal sanction, it would have, as a result of the country s opposition, been repealed by the ne w. before operative. He I? deride the comparison ot the -House of Lords to a mastiff w atching the people’s interests, and trades disputes, said the mast' l ® ran away at tile first snarl of the trades unions, and might more fitly be regarded as Mr. Balfour’s poodle. Mr. js> Smith regarded the scheme or conference as solemn mimicry.. F-irl Percy thought Sir H. C/. Bannerman’s declaration that the House of Commons shall prevail was intended to give tho Ministry greater control over the House of Commons, and meant in the event of a deadlock, the decision should be taken from tbe nconle and transmitted to tbe Crown. iFr. Asquith urged that the House of Lords was the docile• .instrument of one party and not a dispassionate Ul Jlr. e ' Henderson’s amendment in favor of abolition of the House of Lords, was rejected by 315 to lot). The bulk of the Unionists abstained from voting. Twenty Liberals voted with the minority. Sir H. C. Bannerman’s resolution was adopted by 432 to 147. About 20 .Liberals abstained from voting. Newspaper comments consider tlie House of Lords debate in accordance with the party color of the respective papers. The general public have evinced little interest. Many persons look for more practical results torn Lord Rosebery’s committee.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19070629.2.23

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Gisborne Times, Volume XXV, Issue 2119, 29 June 1907, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
300

THE HOUBE OF LORDS. Gisborne Times, Volume XXV, Issue 2119, 29 June 1907, Page 2

THE HOUBE OF LORDS. Gisborne Times, Volume XXV, Issue 2119, 29 June 1907, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert