Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

A CONSCIENTIOUS OFFICIAL

INSPECTOR PROSECUTES HIMSELF. (Per Press Association WELLINGTON, Aug. 7. Before Mr. W. G. Riddell, S.M., in the Magistrate’s Court yesterday, Mr. James Doyle, City Council Inspector, was prosecutor and also defendant. He charged himself with attempting last Sunday morning to enter a car on the Wellington City tramway while the vehio.e was in motion. It was only a few days ago that the City Council resolved to prosecute all persons boarding or alighting from a moving car. Doyle, as prosecutor, intimated that he, as defendant intended to plead guilty. His Worship: Is defendant a firscoffender ?

Mr. Doyle: Yes, Your Worship, as far as I am aware he has not been convicted before.

At this stage Mr. Doyle relinquished the role as prosecutor,- and pleaded on behalf of himself, as defendant. He expressed sorrow for the breach, and explained that he had not committed the offence intentionally. His excuse was that when on the point of boarding the car opposite the police station he' hailed a certain police official who was alighting from another car. He entered into conversation with the officer. and while talking rested one hand on the handle of the door of the vehicle. The motorman, apparently unaware of this, set the car in motion, with the result that defendant was jerked off his feet and fell to the ground. He pointed out that he had suffered severe injuries, to say nothing of the indignity attached to the occurrence.

His Worship remarked that a case in which prosecutor and defendant were the same person was unusual. Although an officer of the corporation, Mr. Doyle had treated bimself as an ordinary citizen, which his Worship considered was a very honorable and sensible thing to do. Defendant must be convicted and fined the usual amount. “However,” remarked His "Worship, “I must sympathise with defendant, and trust the offence will never occur again.” Defendant was fined 5s with costs 7s. Defendant: Will you allow time, your Worship P His Worship: Twenty-four hours to pay

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19090809.2.24.19

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Gisborne Times, Volume XXVII, Issue 2575, 9 August 1909, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
336

A CONSCIENTIOUS OFFICIAL Gisborne Times, Volume XXVII, Issue 2575, 9 August 1909, Page 5

A CONSCIENTIOUS OFFICIAL Gisborne Times, Volume XXVII, Issue 2575, 9 August 1909, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert