Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MAGISTRATE’S COURT.

THURSRDAY, OCTOBER 7. (Before Mr. W. A. Barton, S.M.) A LOAN AND AN ASSIGNMENT. Martha Mackrell sued John Colley for £165 15s 7d, being the balance of money lent, with interest. Mr. G. Stock appeared for the plaintiff, and Mr. F. Nolan for the defendant. The case was that in 1907 Mrs. Mackrell made an advance of £749 11s 6d to the firm of Mackrell and Colley, and later lent £SO. Against that there were a number of credits, of which two items, totalling £5 ss, were disputed. Mr. F. Hall had subsequently lent Mrs Mackrell £125, and in security she had given him an order on all money due to her from Mr. Colley. Mr. Nolan argued that the order was an equitable assignment of all monies due to the plaintiff from the defendant, and that therefore she was not the proper person to claim. , Mr. Stock submitted that if the assignor did not bring an action the assignee could do it in the name of the assignor. Therefore, Mrs. Mackrell was right as assignor to take action. Argument having been heard on both sides, His Worship said that in his opinion Mr. Hall was the proper person to take action, the plaintiff having assigned the debt to him. The plaintiff was non-suited, with costs amounting to £4 12s 6d. . A CLAIM FOR RENT.

Charles Rowe sued John Drummond for £4 rent, and for j>osses&ion of premises. Mr. Burnard appeared for the plaintiff, and Mr. Finn for the defendant. Possession having already been given, this portion of the suit was not pressed, and Mr. Finn objected to the joining of the two claims on the ground that possession was given before the summons was issued. His Worship accordingly non-suited the plaintiff. UNDEFENDED CASES. Judgment was given for the plaintiffs in the following undefended case: William Tattley v. William Brown Kennedy, £B, and costs 8s; ‘‘Gisborne Times” Co. (Mr. Blair) v. Chas. Edward Davis, £4 19s, and 10s costs; P. W. Sargisson and Co. (Mr. Bright) v. Patrick John Hofen (by consent), £7 12s, and 13s costs.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19091008.2.27

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Gisborne Times, Volume XXVII, Issue 2627, 8 October 1909, Page 7

Word count
Tapeke kupu
349

MAGISTRATE’S COURT. Gisborne Times, Volume XXVII, Issue 2627, 8 October 1909, Page 7

MAGISTRATE’S COURT. Gisborne Times, Volume XXVII, Issue 2627, 8 October 1909, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert