Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

FISH AS FOOD.

“DOES WOT NOURISH THE BRAliv’

OLD THEORIES UPSET.

DR, ASHBURTON THOMPSON’S VIEW.

Dr. Aishburton Tliompson, medical officer to the Department oif Public Health, gave evidence in Sydney- before tiho Royal Commission appointed to inquire in to the alleged high cost of food, sitting at the Public Works Department. “I regard fish as inferior to lean meat/’ said the doctor, in the course of his evidence, “as a tissue-builder, because it contains less proteid. Its yield in energy is proportionate to its fat content, and that is low—few fish contain meed than 10 per cent., and the vast majority somewhere about 5 per cent. It has not the same satisfying quality as meat. It has its food value, and its nutritious, and easily digestible wihen boiled or grilled. It is almost wholly absorbable, and assists in introducing variety in diet, which is essential. But its value is relative.

“People who do laborious work may cat moat freely, but those who had sedentary lives, witli a- minimum of physical exertion, should cat little meat. They would do -well to- substitute fish for meat., so as to diminish the amount of their nitrogen intake. ‘Mfish is not specially or directly suitable for tilioso 'wiho are engaged in brain work. It docs not specially nourish the brain or the nervous system, hut it is suitable as a substitute for moat.” The economic value of fish was a doubtful factor, added the doctor, and salt fish was less digestible than fresh. Apparently, fish ought to bo cheaper than' other kinds of food. There was no co-st of cultivation. The complaint made in Australia that fish was unduly expensive had been made, and was still being made, in other countries. It might, so far as New South "Wales was concerned, be based on reasonable grounds, hut it would seem to be general and persistent. Considering the large proportion of people under no necessity for great muscular exertion, lie lrad no doubt that a much freer consumption of meat would be generally beneficial.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19111206.2.55

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Gisborne Times, Volume XXIX, Issue 3392, 6 December 1911, Page 8

Word count
Tapeke kupu
339

FISH AS FOOD. Gisborne Times, Volume XXIX, Issue 3392, 6 December 1911, Page 8

FISH AS FOOD. Gisborne Times, Volume XXIX, Issue 3392, 6 December 1911, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert