NEWS BY THE MAIL.
On the 11th of last mouths, Jot Brady was put on trial for the niurde] of Mr Burke and Lord Frederic* Cavendish. He was defended bj counsel appointed by the Judge anc paid by the Crown. The principal witnesses for the . prosecution wen Carey, Faiell, and Kavanagh, whose evidence did not differ materially from that given by them at the magisterial injury. An attempt was made to prove an alibi. A girl named Mahei deposed that she was walking with Ih'Rtlv from C) o'clock to 8 o'clock on
I>.-: evening of the CJi <;f .layJast, ana a man named Kennedy swore Le saw Brady in inD-nmniek street at five minutes to 7 on the sr.ioe evening. Thir. man's et idmce woulo have been better i£ it hail noii been so -ood. After a consultation of 4(. minutes, tbp jury returned r veidict of guilty, and Brady >vas sentenced to be ex- 1 ecuten on the 14th i<..- 1. IXiuielCurley's ; trial occupied -th?ee days. He is a better type of man than Brady, and his manner was respectful. Carey ■was a^r. in the principal witness for the Cvown. In cross-e:ami:iation he admitted having br-en concerned in 2ii nUciopts io^ "remove "Mr Fwriiter. He eoulJ never be trapped into using the woi-d " murder " in connection with the pi'oceeding : of the Invincible s. Their meetings used to be held on Sundays after Chur.h. Peter Carey, also an approver, corroborated his brother's statements, ano a new witness (Agnes Jones) swore to having seen Uurley at the scene of the murder. On the other hand, the father-in-law of the, , prisoner was positive he had %to : tKnMng Cnrley^ at levetal public-houses on the fatal evening, but lie could not recall anything else that happned that day. He was contradicted l>y another witness for i the defence, who said he saw Curley at the door of Burke' ss house at a quarter to 7on the evening of the 6th. After a short deliberation, the jury- found the prisoner guilty. On being asked if he had anything to say why sentence of death should not be passed upon him, he made a long rambling speech, in which he accused the Judge of unfairness and prejudice, and complained of the manner in which be had been identified. He acknowledged being a Fenian and an Invincible, and took groat credit for being a faithful and conscientious conspirator. "No finger of scorn," he said, ''shall 'be pointed to my character, moral or otherwise." He ended with two lines of patriotic poetry, which is a characteristic of Fenian oratory iv the dock.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/IT18830709.2.10
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Inangahua Times, Volume VIII, Issue 1295, 9 July 1883, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
434NEWS BY THE MAIL. Inangahua Times, Volume VIII, Issue 1295, 9 July 1883, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in