Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ARBITRATION COURT.

COMPENSATION TO WORKERS ACT. ■~.., ;■■ •■

(Per Press Association.)

AUCKLAND, December 7. The Arbitration Ootiirt has given its decision in the compensation case brought ,b.y , JTohn ■ Puhi Matthews against GJfesori'antl Fyfild. The respondents havo"«?a ssrtvm'll near TauinaruTtui; Oii the : 2£nd Juno last, Harry Puhi MattheAvsfi^'^OTi of tha claimant,- while working 'jt'i the mill, was accidentally Killed. The- claimant alleges that ho and tho other member of hfs family wero partially dependent on the earningof the deceased and claims £200 as compensation. Respondents dispute their liability to pay compensation on the grounds that the claimant was not thi> father of the deceased within the meaning of tho Workers Compensation for Accidents Act. The claimant is a Maori. jM or about the year/1889 he took as a wife one Ore wa^ who ;is a Maori and a member of the Ngatihuri tribe The union was arranged in accordance with. Maori customj but tnero was nothing in the nature, of a marriage ceremony. Claimant and Orewa have lived together sine©-as- husba)id and wife and have had issue of,-uino: children.'-'The deceased, Harry, Puhi Matthews, was the eldest of these, chit<lren, and was born on the 4th of November, 1890:. Iv November, 1896, a rpremony of marriage between claimnnb a*nd Orewa was performed without any license under the Marriage Acts tjy'.tho Rev Taimona Hapimaua, a duly «»idained clergyman-of the Church of England. The application for .arbitration was filed in the present case on the S9fch of September last. On the 23rd of October, the cas<s was partly heard nnd then adjourned, on the 27th of October, and before the heariug was resumed the claimant * registered the nirth of his deceased son. Harry Puhi Matthews, under the provisions of the Legitimation Act, 1893, and on the eamn day registeivd the births of three of the other children who had been born to him and Orewa. The question that arrso on these fact* was whether tho claimint was the father of tHe deceased Harry Puhj Matthews for the purposes,,of tho Workers Compensation for Accidents Act, the Court held that In was, and ordered the payment to him of £130 compensation.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WC19081208.2.37

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Wanganui Chronicle, Volume L, Issue 12145, 8 December 1908, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
353

ARBITRATION COURT. Wanganui Chronicle, Volume L, Issue 12145, 8 December 1908, Page 5

ARBITRATION COURT. Wanganui Chronicle, Volume L, Issue 12145, 8 December 1908, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert